<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/">
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://www.ali-omeka.rguclass.com/items/show/6">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Koha Library Software: Full Overview &amp; Key Features]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[<br />
Smart Library Solutions]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:language><![CDATA[English]]></dcterms:language>
    <dcterms:identifier><![CDATA[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YxuWVmRrHCM]]></dcterms:identifier>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://www.ali-omeka.rguclass.com/items/show/3">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Bibliometrics for Library and Information Science Research of Policy Document: Insights from Dimension Database]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:subject><![CDATA[Library and Information Science]]></dcterms:subject>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[In the identified LIS fields Human Society and Law and Legal Studies have led to higher proportions of documentation and this coverage has rapidly increased since the turn of the 21st century. On the other hand, fields like Mathematical Sciences, Psychology, Physical and Chemical Sciences have remarkably less documents published indicating lack of research attention. Although Engineering and Biological Sciences have always produced a high volume of research, they lag behind Commerce, Management and Biomedical Sciences, in writing policy. While matches in Health Sciences, Information and Computing Sciences and Library and Information Studies increase steadily and slowly, contributing to consistency compared with spikes in other fields, it signals further the increased prioritizing of disciplines specifically related to social situation and jurisprudence. At the same time, Environmental Sciences and Economics have modest growth, but are far from the explosive growth of other fields. The findings from this research emphasize the need for a more evenly balanced focus on fields that are less represented, as well as highlighting trends that reveal larger societal, technological and academic currents affecting research focus worldwide as captured in the Dimension Database.]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Merina Ahmed]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:publisher><![CDATA[RGU journal of social science and research]]></dcterms:publisher>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[01 October, 2025]]></dcterms:date>
    <dcterms:format><![CDATA[Digital]]></dcterms:format>
    <dcterms:language><![CDATA[English]]></dcterms:language>
    <dcterms:type><![CDATA[Article]]></dcterms:type>
    <dcterms:identifier><![CDATA[https://www.rgujournal.in/index.php/RGUJSSR/article/view/75]]></dcterms:identifier>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://www.ali-omeka.rguclass.com/items/show/1">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Towards mapping library and information science]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[In an earlier study by the authors, full-text analysis and traditional bibliometric methods were combined to map research papers published in the journal Scientometrics. The main objective was to develop appropriate techniques of full-text analysis and to improve the efficiency of the individual methods in the mapping of science. The number of papers was, however, rather limited. In the present study, we extend the quantitative linguistic part of the previous studies to a set of five journals representing the field of Library and Information Science (LIS). Almost 1000 articles and notes published in the period 2002–2004 have been selected for this exercise. The optimum solution for clustering LIS is found for six clusters. The combination of different mapping techniques, applied to the full text of scientific publications, results in a characteristic tripod pattern. Besides two clusters in bibliometrics, one cluster in information retrieval and one containing general issues, webometrics and patent studies are identified as small but emerging clusters within LIS. The study is concluded with the analysis of cluster representations by the selected journals.]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Frizo Janssens ]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Jacqueline Leta]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Wolfgang Glänzel]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Bart L.R. de Moor]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:publisher><![CDATA[Elsevier]]></dcterms:publisher>
    <dcterms:format><![CDATA[Digital]]></dcterms:format>
    <dcterms:language><![CDATA[English]]></dcterms:language>
    <dcterms:identifier><![CDATA[https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2006.03.025]]></dcterms:identifier>
</rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
